Showing posts with label Term Sheet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Term Sheet. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Stocks fly while VC funds crawl; KPCB on double secret probation


The Dow Jones Average closed at its highest point in history yesterday.  So how do public stocks now compare with VC returns?  Our analysis lags a bit in time.  DJIA heights hit the TV news right away, while the only reliable source of broad-scale VC returns comes though the National Venture Capital Association (NVCA) and takes a while to collect.  That said, here are most recent short term and long term returns for the venture capital business over the past ten years compared to the public equity markets in the US.






We suspect that if the chart above were updated in real time it would be a bad day for the VCs and perhaps for the Angels too.
 
For over a decade we have been using charts similar to that above when we lecture in Jeff Sohl’s private equity class at UNH.  Reliably, for most of that time, the best returns have been realized in early stage funds. I then argue, by reference, that this “sweet spot” is the best place for angels to concentrate. Woe is me! Based on this chart, the sweet spots might well be an index fund and a home on the beach.
How the mighty are falling.

The conventional wisdom in the industry says that even though average VC returns are down, the large and famous funds, the flagships of the industry, continue to do well.  The evidence lies in the fact that certain firms have been very successful in raising new funds.  For example, Spark Capital in Boston, a venture capital investor in Twitter, Foursquare and Tumblr, announced last month that is has raised $450 million in its largest fund to date.

Yet to our surprise, the world’s best known fund, Kleiner Perkins, may be feeling the strain.  Dean Wormer of Faber College having retired, they appear to have voluntarily placed themselves on double secret probation.

Reuters reports today that blue-chip venture-capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers expressed frustration with poor fund performance and promised to do better at gatherings for investors last month, according to people familiar with the discussions.

“The firm, which has lost some of its shine recently due in part to hefty bets on green energy technology and a lack of home-run Internet investments, said it would be more careful with capital and redouble its efforts to boost performance. Several investors who received invitations to the meetings said it was unusual for Kleiner Perkins to hold such gatherings when it was not raising new funds,” write Sarah McBride & Mark Boslet.

“They’re just frustrated and upset that the performance hasn’t been as good as they think it should be, and they are candid about it,” said one investor, or limited partner, who attended one of the meetings and requested anonymity.

Why do we call this double secret probation?  Because KPCB won’t identify which of their funds they are talking about or what their returns (IRR) actually are. A spokeswoman for Kleiner Perkins said: “Communications between Kleiner Perkins and its limited partners are private and confidential. As such, we do not comment on them.”

Luckily, Dan Primack of Term Sheet does comment. “So I reached out to some of the firm’s investors, who tell me that Kleiner Perkins chose to significantly reduce holding values on numerous portfolio companies for Q4, which was a change from relatively static holding values used during the prior quarters. So these meetings were to preempt LPs from being surprised when the year-end report arrived.” 

“Finally, one LP also is sure to point out that performance ‘weakness’ is relative. ‘Current KP funds are performing pretty well, not rock star but upper quartile.’”

Regular readers of our e-pistles know that VC and angel returns are a topic we follow closely. You can find more detail on this chart in the NVCA press release, located here. You can find more about Angel investment performance vs. VCs here and here. Term Sheet is here.

Apparently, Tom Perkins of KPCB no longer owns this yacht, "The Maltese Falcon."


Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Are Moron Angel Investors Causing a Series A Crunch?


“Let's All Shed Tears For The Crappy Startups That Can’t Raise Any More Money,” says Dan Lyons . “And raise a glass to the moron angel investors who created this mess.”
   
So who is Dan Lyons and is he really toasting us?  Are French words best for describing both entrepreneurs and agent provocateurs?  And is there really a Series A Crunch?  In his excellent commentary today, the ever-insightful Dan Primack replies:

“Lots of tech startups that raised seed funding can't get follow-on investments from venture capitalists, thus causing the companies to disappear. It's being called the "Series A crunch" (®Sarah Lacy), and has sparked the type of schadenfreude usually reserved for a Kardashian divorce.

Be seeded, be resented.

“To be clear, I'm a firm believer in the idea of entrepreneurial meritocracy. The best companies should continue to get funded, and the lousy ones should fold so their employees can move on to more worthwhile pursuits.

“What I don't quite get, however, is why so many people believe venture capitalists are infallible arbiters of what rocks and what sucks. These are many of the same venture capitalists who helped inflate the dotcom bubble before it burst -- getting its recessionary goo all over America. And the same ones who slowed down their investing pace in the middle aughts, when companies like Facebook were just getting started. And who gave absurd late-stage valuations to companies like Zynga. And who let Andrew Mason cash out all of that Groupon stock pre-IPO. And who do you think first put money into Solyndra?

“My point isn't that venture capitalists are dummies. It's that they can make mistakes. Just take a look at the companies that Bessemer Venture Partners admits to having passed on. Every firm has regrets, and it's not unreasonable to think that certain quality startups fall through the cracks. Or that some undeserving companies get to move forward. In fact, the "Series A crunch" likely means that more errors are being made, rather than fewer (since VCs are sorting through an increased number of seed-funded deals, without getting more hours in the day).

“One more thing: Before insulting all those "dopey angel investors," it might be worth understanding why they backed so many companies in the first place. Research has shown that angels have the best chance of producing positive returns by investing in more, not fewer, startups. And I don't mean five rather than two. I mean 50 rather than 10.

“But don't let me ruin the fun of feeling superior to all those folks in Silicon Valley who foolishly chased their dreams (or who helped others to do so). I'm sure that venture capitalists will make everything work out okay..”


A Moron’s Diary

Living once again in the Northeast, I don’t believe I have heard anyone use the term “moron” since I left Texas.  In Houston, it was pronounced “moe….raawn”, accents on both syllables, and was frequently and loudly  applied to motorists of whose driving habits the speaker disapproved.  Conflict often ensued.

To apply the term moron to persons who give generously of their time, energy, experience, and savings to help give the other guy a chance to start a business and be successful, to advance technology, and to contribute to the regional economy seems a bit mean spirited. Perhaps, in these difficult times, the world would benefit from a few more good morons.

From my perch, the Series A crunch is far from proven.   Right now, seed valuations are rising, more VCs are entering the angel investing space, and our regional angel groups have joined forces to have greater control over their own destiny.

So who are we quoting today? 

Dan Lyons is Editor-in-Chief of ReadWrite. Previously, Dan was Technology Editor at Newsweek. Before that he spent a decade at Forbes, covering technology. Dan was the creator of "The Secret Diary of Steve Jobs," a satirical blog written in the persona of Fake Steve Jobs. Want another sound bite from him:

“ For the past few years we’ve had people calling themselves “investors,” who have no experience investing, swanning around the Valley, slinging money at people calling themselves “entrepreneurs” who have never held an actual job, let alone run a company. How could this have ended in anything but a train wreck?”

Dan Primack, Senior Editor, Fortune, writes a daily newsletter, TermSheet, covering the latest news on private equity, M&A, deals and movements — from Wall Street to Silicon Valley. Previously, Dan was an editor-at-large with Thomson Reuters, where he launched both peHUB.com and the peHUB Wire email service. In a past journalistic life, Dan ran a community paper in Roxbury, Massachusetts. He currently lives just outside of Boston.

Exceeding thanks go to Dan Primack for allowing us to quote extensively from today’s issue of Term Sheet. We’ll reserve our thanks to Dan Lyons until he tells us who is paying for his toast. Like the toasts at many of our youthful marriages, this one may end up costing us a great deal in the long run.
  
In times lang syne, Pogo cartoons proclaiming “We have met the enemy, and he is us!” once lined the Infinite Corridor at MIT.  My friend GK suggests we nominate Lyons for an Anti-Pogo Award: “We have met the enemy, and he is anyone but me!”
 


The illustration above is reproduced only in low resolution and is used to support our argument. We believe this qualifies as fair use under copyright law.
_________________________________________________

 Receive this blog and related angel information as an App on your smart phone or tablet. 
Instructions here: http://tinyurl.com/c6xcqar